Skip to the main content

Fibroblast growth factor

Protein Growth Factor

Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGF) are a family of 22 signalling proteins that act as the ’s primary “signalling currency” for repair and regeneration. In clinical aesthetics, we focus on a specific quartet: FGF2 (angiogenesis and ), FGF7 and FGF10 (the dermal-epidermal communication axis), and FGF21 (inflammatory resolution). FGFs are not freely circulating; they are sequestered within the extracellular matrix (ECM) bound to (HSPGs). Therefore, the efficacy of FGF-based treatments like iPRF is entirely dependent on matrix integrity. In an MMP-degraded , the “reservoir” is broken, leading to poor growth factor retention and attenuated treatment results.

Fibroblast growth factors are a family of 22 structurally related signalling proteins, ranging from 17 to 34 kDa in molecular weight, that act through four tyrosine kinase receptors – FGFR1 through FGFR4 – to regulate cellular proliferation, migration, and differentiation across mesodermal, ectodermal, and endodermal cell lineages. [1] Despite the name, FGFs are not exclusively -acting. The name reflects their original discovery context rather than their full biological scope. In skin specifically, the active family membership is considerably narrower than the full 22-member family: FGF2, FGF7, FGF10, and FGF21 are the dominant isoforms expressed and functional in skin tissue. [7] Understanding what each of these four does, and what happens when their activity declines, is more clinically useful than treating the family as an undifferentiated whole.

The Four Skin-Dominant FGF Members

FGF2 (basic FGF, bFGF) is the most extensively characterised member in skin biology. It is released by damaged endothelial cells and macrophages at wound sites and acts on dermal fibroblasts to stimulate proliferation, migration, and through ERK, AKT, and STAT1 phosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner. FGF2 is also a potent angiogenic factor – if FGF2 activity is blocked, wound angiogenesis is almost completely impaired. [8] In wound healing, FGF2 accelerates closure by promoting epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in combination with TGF-β1, though importantly, FGF2 alone does not activate EMT in keratinocytes; the co-stimulus of 1 is required. [4] This co-dependency with TGF-β1 is clinically relevant to the context, where both growth factors are delivered simultaneously within the same preparation.

FGF7 (keratinocyte growth factor, KGF) acts exclusively on epithelial cells. It is the only FGF family member with this restricted specificity, at least in adult tissue. [1] Produced by dermal fibroblasts and epidermal γδ T cells, FGF7 signals in a paracrine direction from the dermis upward to keratinocytes, stimulating their migration, proliferation, and differentiation. This fibroblast-to-keratinocyte signalling axis is part of the broader dermal–epidermal communication infrastructure that maintains epidermal homeostasis and coordinates wound re-epithelialisation.

FGF10 (KGF-2) shares FGF7’s keratinocyte-stimulating role. It is produced by fibroblasts in the and interfollicular dermis and signals parabolically to epidermal keratinocytes through FGFR2IIIb. FGF10 and FGF7 have overlapping but distinct binding affinities for heparan sulphate – FGF7 binds less tightly to the ECM matrix, making it more diffusible, whilst FGF10 is more ECM-retained and acts across shorter distances. [6] This structural difference in ECM binding governs how far and how fast each signal travels through tissue, which matters for the spatial organisation of epidermal repair.

FGF21 is the most recently characterised skin-relevant member. It promotes fibroblast motility, accelerates wound closure, and through the JNK signalling pathway reduces local inflammatory mediators whilst enhancing collagen synthesis and vascular network formation at wound sites. [5] FGF21’s combination of anti-inflammatory and pro-synthetic activity makes it mechanistically interesting in the context of treating skin where chronic inflammation has suppressed fibroblast output, though its specific therapeutic applications in aesthetic medicine remain at early research stage.

The Skin-Specific FGF Quartet

IsoformPrimary SourceTarget CellClinical Primary Function
FGF2 (bFGF)Macrophages / EndotheliumFibroblastsProliferation, Collagen synthesis, Angiogenesis.
FGF7 (KGF)Fibroblasts / T-CellsKeratinocytesParacrine signaling; Re-epithelialisation.
FGF10 (KGF-2)Dermal PapillaKeratinocytesSpatial organization of epidermal repair.
FGF21Injured TissueFibroblastsAnti-inflammatory; JNK-mediated synthesis.

The ECM Reservoir: Why Matrix Health Affects FGF Availability

One of the most clinically significant and least discussed aspects of FGF biology is that most FGFs are not freely circulating in tissue fluid. They are stored bound to heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in the extracellular matrix, where they are held in an inactive but protected form, available for rapid release when tissue injury or enzymatic activity creates local demand. FGF2 in particular binds to the HSPG perlecan in the dermal ECM – binding that is entirely heparan sulphate-dependent and completely blocked when heparan sulphate-degrading enzymes are applied. [3]

The clinical consequence is that the integrity of the dermal ECM is not simply a structural matter but a determinant of FGF availability. When -driven collagen fragmentation and proteoglycan degradation progressively erode the ECM in aged or photodamaged skin, they simultaneously deplete the heparan sulphate-proteoglycan binding sites that hold FGF2 and other growth factors in the tissue reserve. The dermis becomes structurally thinner and simultaneously less well-stocked with the repair signals it would need to respond to injury. This is a compounding deficit: reduced ECM means reduced FGF reservoir means reduced regenerative capacity, which in turn produces less collagen synthesis to replenish the ECM. The MMP entity describes the structural side of this loop; FGF availability is the signalling-reservoir side of the same story.

The “Reservoir” Logic

Dermal StateHSPG StatusFGF ReservoirTreatment Result
Healthy / YoungIntact / DenseHigh CapacityRapid, robust response to injury/treatment.
Photoaged / MMP+Fragmented / DegradedDepletedAttenuated response; “leaky” growth factor retention.
PN-PrimedProteoglycans ProtectedRestorediPRF payload is anchored and sustained.

FGF Signalling and Cellular Senescence

Beyond wound healing and collagen synthesis, FGF signalling plays an active role in maintaining fibroblast proliferative capacity and resisting . FGFs promote self-renewing proliferation and inhibit cellular senescence in nearly all tissues tested, and reduced FGF signalling is associated with accelerated senescence entry in fibroblast populations. [2] In ageing skin, where the dermal fibroblast population is both smaller in number and progressively accumulating senescent cells, declining FGF signalling capacity – driven by reduced ECM reservoir, reduced FGFR expression, and reduced -derived FGF release from declining platelet counts – contributes to the self-reinforcing cycle of fibroblast senescence and reduced ECM production that the Fibroblast entity describes in detail.

FGF and the FGFR1/FGFR2 Barrier Axis

A less obvious but mechanistically important FGF function in skin is FGFR1 and FGFR2 signalling in keratinocytes. This controls integrity, epidermal barrier function, and skin appendage maintenance through regulation of claudins and other tight junction components. The responsible FGF ligands are FGF1, FGF7, FGF10, and FGF22, expressed in different skin compartments and signalling across the DEJ from dermis to . This connects FGF signalling not only to the structural dermis but to the epidermal barrier function discussed in the , , and entities. This is a less-appreciated route through which declining FGF signalling in aged dermis contributes to epidermal barrier deterioration above it.

Published
Updated

Clinical Application

FGFs aren’t a treatment target in the same sense that collagen synthesis or MMP suppression are; they’re a signalling currency, and the clinical question is what delivers it, when, and into what kind of tissue environment.

iPRF as the primary FGF delivery vehicle

iPRF is the most clinically direct route to FGF delivery in the Creative Touch portfolio. Activated platelets release FGF2 alongside TGF-β, , , and . The iPRF fibrin matrix provides sustained, slow release of these growth factors rather than a single bolus. The fibrin scaffold actively retains FGF2 through heparin-like binding interactions with the fibrin network, extending its bioavailability in the treatment zone over days rather than hours. This sustained release matters because FGF2’s effects on fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis are concentration-dependent and time-dependent. A brief high-concentration pulse produces a different cellular response than a sustained moderate-concentration signal.

The co-delivery of FGF2 with TGF-β1 in iPRF is also particularly significant given that FGF2 alone does not activate keratinocyte EMT; it requires the TGF-β1 co-stimulus that iPRF provides simultaneously. [4] For wound re-epithelialisation following laser or , this co-delivery into the same tissue zone at the same time is mechanistically more complete than either growth factor could achieve alone.

The tissue environment problem – and why it matters for FGF

Here’s something worth understanding about FGF treatment response that isn’t widely discussed: delivering FGF2 (whether through iPRF or any other route) into a dermis with severely depleted heparan sulphate proteoglycans produces a different outcome than delivering it into a dermis where the ECM reservoir infrastructure is intact. If MMP-driven proteoglycan degradation has eroded the HSPG binding sites that normally hold FGF2 in the tissue, the delivered growth factor has fewer anchoring points, shorter tissue dwell time, and reduced sustained signalling capacity. This is one mechanistic reason why , which suppress the MMP activity degrading those proteoglycans, are not just complementary to iPRF but actually improve the conditions in which iPRF’s FGF payload operates. Treating the ECM environment before or alongside direct growth factor delivery produces more durable results than the growth factors alone into a degraded matrix.

RF microneedling, thulium laser, and the endogenous FGF response

Professional treatments that create controlled tissue injury – , microneedling, and – trigger endogenous FGF release as part of the natural wound-healing cascade, through and macrophage and endothelial cell FGF2 secretion at the treatment zone. [8] Applying iPRF at the time of these treatments, either as a topical during microneedling channel creation or as a combined protocol, amplifies this endogenous FGF signal with exogenous growth factor delivery into the same wound healing window. The FGF2–TGF-β1 co-stimulus for keratinocyte EMT is particularly relevant to thulium laser, where re-epithelialisation of microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) is the primary mechanism of skin renewal.

Clinical Synergies

PairingThe Mechanistic Reason
iPRF + ThuliumFGF2 + TGF-1 co-stimulus is required for MTZ re-epithelialisation.
Polynucleotides + iPRFPN suppresses the MMPs that would otherwise degrade the iPRF FGF payload.
RFM + iPRFAmplifies the endogenous FGF-2 release with exogenous supply during the “wound window.”

What FGF doesn’t do, and the honest framing for clients

FGFs are not a shortcut to collagen density in the way that the sustained fibroblast activation from polynucleotides or provides. Their primary role is wound-healing coordination – mobilising and directing the repair response when tissue has been damaged or signalled to remodel. In healthy, undamaged skin, FGF levels are relatively low and HSPG-bound; it’s the injury or treatment stimulus that mobilises them. This means FGF-delivering treatments like iPRF work best as part of a protocol that also creates the appropriate tissue stimulus, i.e. combined with controlled injury treatments rather than used in isolation in the absence of any remodelling signal.

References
  1. Alzheimer C, Werner S (2000). Fibroblast Growth Factors. Landes Bioscience.

  2. Coutu DL, Galipeau J (2011). Roles of FGF signaling in stem cell self-renewal, senescence and aging. Aging (Albany NY), 3(10), 920-33 .

  3. Eckes B, Nischt R, Krieg T (2010). Cell-matrix interactions in dermal repair and scarring. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair, 3, 4 .

  4. Koike Y, Yozaki M, Utani A, et al. (2020). Fibroblast growth factor 2 accelerates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in keratinocytes during wound healing process. Sci Rep, 10(1), 18545 .

  5. Lin S, Tang L, Xu N (2025). Research progress and strategy of FGF21 for skin wound healing. Front Med (Lausanne), 12, 1510691 .

  6. Makarenkova HP, Hoffman MP, Beenken A, et al. (2009). Differential interactions of FGFs with heparan sulfate control gradient formation and branching morphogenesis. Sci Signal, 2(88), ra55 .

  7. Song YH, Zhu YT, Ding J, et al. (2016). Distribution of fibroblast growth factors and their roles in skin fibroblast cell migration. Mol Med Rep, 14(4), 3336-42 .

  8. Yun YR, Won JE, Jeon E, et al. (2010). Fibroblast growth factors: biology, function, and application for tissue regeneration. J Tissue Eng, 2010, 218142 .

Also Known As

  • FGF
  • fibroblast growth factors

Biological Relationships

Biological Interactions

Influenced By

  • this Produced by Evidence: DP beta-catenin activity regulates FGF signalling to keratinocytes; FGF7/FGF10 are key DP-produced anagen-initiation signals. Enshell-Seijffers et al. (2010) Dev Cell 18(4):633. PMC2893731
  • this Required by Evidence: FGF signalling is required for DP cell maintenance of inductive capacity; FGF7/FGF10 activate Wnt in early anagen via DP. Gessese et al. (2024) Scientific World J 2024:5259055. doi:10.1155/tswj/5259055
  • this Required by

Learn More

This topic is discussed in 1 article: